« Estimation Accuracy - Fear No Evil | Main | Why Your Business Needs Agile Development »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83452ee9169e200d8342bf62853ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Can Gantt Charts be Agile?:
» AGile and Gantt chart : Agile Chronicles: Can Gantt Charts be Agile? from Everything and the Mobile Software Universe...
Interesting read :
Agile Chronicles: Can Gantt Charts be Agile?
We try to put in place Agile methods here, but even if as software developpers we strongly believe in the iteration process and so one : we have traditional clients that need to know Date... [Read More]
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Forgive me to start out with since I am a PMP and an old software engineer who has done lots of DoD projects. I have been associated with successful projects that used techniques like 'agile' before they were called 'agile' - even on DoD projects.
The chart you describe and posted here I have heard called a 'horse blanket' chart because it looked like an old Army calvary horse blanket.
Posted by: David Tannen | Tuesday, May 23, 2006 at 11:27 AM
I suspect that Gantt have the visual appeal of being simple and traditional, but in an agile context I am uncomfortable with their use. There is a very fine line between taking an adaptive approach to project development and a deterministic approach and it is very easy to slip accross that line. The problem I see with a Gantt chart is it tends to reify a set of relationships (in general the relationship of time to granular tasks) that the team needs to work to keep dynamic.
I can understand that a Gantt chart can be used in a manner that is helpful in an agile setting, but I suspect that the risk is greater than I am comfortable with
Posted by: Bill Gonch | Tuesday, May 23, 2006 at 07:26 PM